Legal Opinion

St. Hubert v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 8, 2020No. 19-5267PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of Justice SOTOMAYOR respecting the denial of certiorari.

The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) imposes several restrictions on inmates seeking to file a second or successive habeas petition. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244, 2255. Among other things, the inmate must first seek leave from a court of appeals, which may not authorize a filing unless the inmate demonstrates, as a prima facie matter, that the petition will be based either on new evidence sufficient to establish that no reasonable factfinder would have found the defendant guilty or on a new constitutional…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Buck v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  5. United States v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jackson v. GolickDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
  2. Quinlan v. King CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
  3. United States v. BarronDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
  4. United States v. ClarkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
  5. United States v. Deft. 1District Court, District of Columbia · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API