Kottlowski v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Lawrence Kottlowski, Mike Dietzel and Tony Harter (collectively “Employees”) appeal from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of their employer, Bridge-stone/Firestone, Inc., d/b/a American Tire and Service Subsidiary of Bridgestone/Fire-stone (“Firestone”). Employees filed suit against Firestone when their toolboxes, con-taming their tools, were stolen from the Firestone shop. Employees claimed that Firestone was negligent and that a bailment for their mutual benefit existed. Following a hearing, the trial court entered summary…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Webb v. JarvisIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Eby v. York-Division, Borg-WarnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Tibbs v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GossettIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- K-B Corp. v. GallagherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Bushong v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- American Family Mutual Insuran v. David WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Smeigh v. Johns Manville, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Pitman v. PitmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Board of School Commissioners v. PettigrewIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.