Legal Opinion

City of Carlsbad v. Shah

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 20, 2009No. Case 08CV1211 JLS (WMc)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (2) DECLARING PLAINTIFF AS THE RIGHTFUL OWNER OF THE TRADEMARKS AND LOGO AT ISSUE (3) AUTHORIZING USPTO TO DENY REGISTRATION OF DEFENDANT’S APPLICATIONS AND REGISTER PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATIONS.

JANIS L. SAMMARTINO, District Judge.

In the present action, the City of Carlsbad (“Plaintiff’) alleges various claims against Prince Reza Shah (“Defendant”), including copyright infringement, cybersquatting, unfair competition in violation of the Lanham Act; unfair competition in violation of California’s Business and Professional Code § 17200,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Aktieselskabet Af 21. November 2001 v. Fame Jeans Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  5. Schneider v. TRW, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DRL Enters., Inc. v. N. Atl. Operating Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Kelly Services, Inc. v. Creative Harbor, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
  3. DRL Enterprises, Inc. v. North Atlantic Operating Company, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API