Legal Opinion

Moncharsh v. Heily & Blase

California Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1992No. S020997Published

1Opinion of the Court

3 Cal.4th 1 (1992)

832 P.2d 899

10 Cal. Rptr.2d 183

PHILIP I. MONCHARSH, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

HEILY & BLASE et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Docket No. S020997.

Supreme Court of California.

July 30, 1992.

COUNSEL

Philip I. Moncharsh, in pro. per., Townsend & Townsend, Paul W. Vapnek and Mark L. Pettinari for Plaintiff and Appellant.

DeWitt F. Blase, in pro. per., Heily & Blase and John R. Johnson for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

LUCAS, C.J.

We granted review in this case to decide, inter alia, the extent to which a trial court may review an arbitrator's decision for errors of law. For the…

2Cases cited100 opinions

  1. Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API