Legal Opinion
Grigsby v. Ross
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 29, 1934No. Civ. No. 8952PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered pursuant to an order sustaining defendants’ demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend. The action was instituted in the Superior Court in and for Los *758Angeles County, and it is contended by defendants, in support of the trial court’s order, that exclusive jurisdiction to hear and determine the action was in the Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles. We are of the opinion that the trial court was correct in so holding.
It appears from the complaint that the county of Los Angeles let a contract to the defendant Ross to clear a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bates v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Slayden v. O'DeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Hindle v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- L. W. Blinn Lumber Co. v. Pioneer Drainage DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Johnston Gas Furnace Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Calhoun v. Huntington Park First Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960