Legal Opinion
Genesis Environmental Services v. San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 20, 2003No. F039948PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORNELL, J.
This appeal involves a general demurrer sustained without leave to amend and raises the question of whether the allegations made were sufficient to state a cause of action under any legal theory. Appellant, Genesis Environmental Services (Genesis), alleges that the negligence of the respondent, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (the District), prevented it from remaining eligible to pursue the business of testing emissions for companies and other sources subject to mandatory emissions testing. The District contends it owed no duty to see that Genesis…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harlen Associates v. The Incorporated Village of Mineola and Board of Trustees for the Incorporated Village of MineolaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Basim Esmail, Zabco Enterprises, Incorporated, and Nazco Enterprises, Incorporated v. Samuel T. MacRane Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Gutierrez v. Carmax Auto Superstores Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Las Lomas Land Company, LLC v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- County Sanitation District No. 2 v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- SYNGENTA CORP PROTECTION, INC. v. HellikerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. City of TurlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.