Legal Opinion

Whitt v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 2012No. ED 97046PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KURT S. ODENWALD, Chief Judge.

Introduction

Jamel Whitt (“Whitt”) appeals from the motion court’s denial without an evidentia-ry hearing of his motion for post-conviction relief. Whitt was convicted of first-degree murder and armed criminal action for the death of Rodney Staples. We affirmed Whitt’s conviction on direct appeal in State v. Whitt, 330 S.W.3d 487 (Mo.App. E.D.2010). Whitt subsequently filed a motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15 1 alleging his defense counsel at trial was ineffective for failing to assert a not guilty by reason of insanity defense; failing to produce…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  4. Deck v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  5. White v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. King v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Harper v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Moore v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Stragliati v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. John King v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API