Legal Opinion

Mohamad v. Simmons

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 15, 2000No. COA99-1090PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN, Judge.

Defendants Doreena Shapialle Simmons and Gary Simmons appeal the trial court’s 16 April 1999 order (the Order) allowing plaintiff Layla Mohamad’s “Motion to Enforce Arbitration Award and/or Attorney Fees and Expenses” and denying defendants’ “Motion for Imposition of Sanctions.” We affirm.

Pertinent facts and procedural history include the following: On 10 May 1996, plaintiff and Doreena Simmons were involved in an automobile collision. Plaintiff subsequently complained of back pain and was examined by her physician and thereafter treated by a chiropractor, accumulating total bills…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hursey v. Homes by Design, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Stan D. Bowles Distributing Co. v. Pabst Brewing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Hudson v. Game World, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bledsole v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Bledsole v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Brock and Scott Holdings, Inc. v. WestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. Parks v. GreenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Bledsole v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API