Legal Opinion
In Re Cross
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 7, 1994No. 11-13082PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge. A. INTRODUCTION
In In re Magosin, 75 B.R. 545, 547 (Bankr. E.D.Pa.1987), this court set down a specific formula to be used in applying the deceptively-opaque language of 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)(1), relating to avoidance of judicial liens. A lienholder has taken issue with the formulation set forth in Magosin, contending that it is inconsistent with the principles set forth by the Supreme Court in Dewsnup v. Timm, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 773, 116 L.Ed.2d 903 (1992), and the holdings of several other bankruptcy courts.
We find no basis to abandon the Magosin…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Owen v. OwenSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re Sandor Chabot in Re Betty B. Chabot, Debtors. City National Bank v. Sandor Chabot Betty B. ChabotCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Tanner v. FinanceAmerica Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Tanner)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Paul Menell, Debtor. Paul Menell v. First National Bank of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- In Re PiersolUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- In Re ChristieUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- In Re McQueenDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1995