Legal Opinion
Bungie Inc v. Bansal
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided September 22, 2021No. 2:21-cv-01111Unknown
1Opinion
1 HONORABLE THOMAS S. ZILLY 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 BUNGIE, INC., a Delaware corporation, Case No. 2:21-cv-1111-TSZ 10 Plaintiff, 11 PLAINTIFF BUNGIE, INC.’S EX PARTE v. MOTION FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE 12 KUNAL BANSAL, an individual, d/b/a 13 LAVICHEATS.COM; and DOES 1-30, inclusive, 14 Defendants. 15 16 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f)(3), Plaintiff Bungie, Inc. seeks leave to 17 effectuate service of process upon Defendant Kunal Bansal by (1) email and (2) posting to the 18 forum on the website operated by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International InterlinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- New England Regional Council of Carpenters v. Thomas J. Kinton, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Gurung v. MalhotraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Ameris Bank ex rel. Federal Deposit Insurance v. SB Partners, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2016