Sovereign Camp, W.O.W. v. Bailey

The appellant's propositions in effect present the points in view: (1) That the insured was not reinstated as a matter of right under his lapsed certificate, because at the time he was sick with a disease from which he subsequently died; and (2) the order did not waive compliance with the requirement of good health of the insured, and is not estopped from insisting that the insured was not a member in good standing at the time of his death.

It is believed that the appellant's contention should be sustained. The laws of the order, quoted above, together with the benefit certificate, constitute…