Legal Opinion

New York State Labor Relations Board v. Kleen-Rite Process Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 17, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The court did not acquire jurisdiction to punish the appellant Harry Urovsky for contempt for the reason that he was not made a party to this proceeding by any process directed against him. (Judiciary Law, § 751.)

The order should also be modified as to the appellant KleenRite Process Corporation by efiminating the fine of $250 imposed *60under section 773 of the Judiciary Law, stated in the order to represent the “ costs and expenses ” of the proceeding and directed to be paid to the New York State Labor Relations Board. The record contains no evidence of the amount of these costs and expenses,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fenlon v. DempseyNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  2. People ex rel. Lawyers' Surety Co. v. AnthonyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Samuels v. GanzNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Kuriansky v. AliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Spuncraft, Inc. v. Lori Jay Manufacturing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API