Legal Opinion

United States v. Chandler

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided December 16, 1957No. 8360PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRY E. WATKINS, District Judge.

In a motion to dismiss, defendants set up four grounds for dismissal of the indictment: (1) that the facts alleged fail to state an offense under 18 U.S. C.A. § 241; (2) that the indictment has been defaced so as not to be the true and actual bill returned against them by the Grand Jury; (3) that the indictment fails to set forth sufficient facts to enable defendants to plead or prepare a defense; and (4) that 18 U.S. C.A. § 241 does not cover the offenses -with which defendants are charged. I find no merit in any of these contentions, and the motion to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Ex Parte YarbroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. United States v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. United States v. SaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. United States v. SaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BetheaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  2. United States v. WestonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. Don Weston, United States of America v. Fugate Crumley, United States of America v. Woodrow Robinson, United States of America v. Angus David, United States of America v. Edgar Kirk, United States of America v. Curtis Rowe and Ruby RoweCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API