Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Reliable Concrete Pumping, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 7, 2005No. 53732-6-IPublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Judicial estoppel is an equitable doctrine that precludes a party from gaining an advantage by asserting one position in a court proceeding and later seeking an advantage by taking a clearly inconsistent *225position.1 “ ‘The purposes of the doctrine are to preserve respect for judicial proceedings without the necessity of resort to the perjury statutes; to bar as evidence statements by a party which would be contrary to sworn testimony the party has given in prior judicial proceedings; and to avoid inconsistency, duplicity, and . . . waste of time.’ ”2 In this case, Richard and Marci…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Browning Manufacturing v. Mims (In Re Coastal Plains, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  4. Lawrence Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, an Illinois Corporation David's Restaurant SupplyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. United Jersey BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Arkison v. Ethan Allen, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Arkison v. Ethan Allen, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Bartley-Williams v. KendallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. Cunningham v. Reliable Concrete Pumping, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. Bartley-Williams v. KendallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API