Rann v. . Home Insurance Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Insurers have the right to insist upon the due observance of every condition to which the assured has assented by accepting the policy or otherwise, and to the benefit of every restriction and limitation upon their liability, provided for in the contract of insurance. In the interpretation of conditions inserted in and making a part of the contract by insurers and in language chosen by them, care should be taken that a strained and unnatural effect should not be given to words and terms to the prejudice of the insured, and in no case should they be extended by implication, so as to embrace…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. Gillette Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Griffey v. New York Central InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Schwarzbach v. Ohio Valley Protective UnionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
- Incorporated Village of Cedarhurst v. Hanover InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1994
- Rosenwald v. Phenix Ins.New York Supreme Court · 1888
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.