Legal Opinion
Incorporated Village of Cedarhurst v. Hanover Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 6, 1994PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*796OPINION OF THE COURT
Allan L. Winick, J.
Defendant moves to consolidate two actions arising out of similar incidents. Defendant also moves to dismiss the complaint in each of the actions.
Plaintiff cross-moves for summary judgment in each of the actions. Plaintiff has no opposition to the joinder of the two actions.
Plaintiff, Incorporated Village of Cedarhurst, has commenced two separate declaratory judgment actions which arose by reason of the disclaimer of insurance coverage by defendant Hanover Insurance Company. The instant actions were commenced as a result of two separate negligence…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Breed v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. Gillette Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Ruder & Finn Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Technicon Electronics Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- International Paper Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States Underwriters Insurance v. Affordable Housing Foundation, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- General Accident Insurance Co. of America v. Idbar Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Englewood v. Commercial Union Assurance CompaniesColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Incorporated Village of Cedarhurst v. Hanover InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Town of Harrison v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.