Legal Opinion

United States v. Nardone

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 9, 1939No. 412PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The accused appeal from a judgment convicting them under an indictment in three counts two for smuggling and concealing alcohol, and a third for a conspiracy to do so. We affirmed an earlier conviction under the same indictment (United States v. Nardone, 2 Cir., 90 F.2d 630), but- the Supreme Court reversed our judgment (Nardone v. United States, 302 U.S. 379, 58 S.Ct. 275, 82 L.Ed. 314) because of the admission of certain telephone “taps” which we thought competent, but they did not. Upon the present trial the same transactions were proved by what, generally speaking,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. United States v. KrausDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1921
  5. United States v. NardoneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. United States v. Glen Shoffner, Richard Henry Fiedler, and Leonard Michael Stange, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. Saul I. BirnbaumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  4. Anthony Panci v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  5. Braatelien v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API