Legal Opinion
Pittston Co. v. Allianz Insurance
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 19, 1992No. Civ. A. 90-3631PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLIN, District Judge.
Before the Court is a motion by plaintiff Pittston Company (“Pittston”) and plaintiffs in intervention Ultramar America, Limited and Ultramar Petroleum, Inc. (collectively “Ultramar”), and cross-motions by various defendants, all which seek a declaration of which body of law governs the interpretation of a number of insurance contracts. The parties variously seek to have New'Jersey, New York or federal maritime law applied to the contracts of insurance at issue in this action. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ cross-motions will be denied, and plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Lauritzen v. LarsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- First National City Bank v. Banco Para El Comercio Exterior De CubaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gilbert Spruance Co. v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Pittston Co. Ultramar America Ltd. v. Allianz InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Pittston Co. v. Allianz InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- Berger v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1996
- Royal Insurance Co. of America v. KSI Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.