Legal Opinion

Boucek v. Pondelicek

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 14, 1930No. Gen. No. 34,271PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Soanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

Joseph Boucek, appellee, filed his hill to impress certain property in Wilmette, Cook county, Illinois, with an equitable mortgage and to foreclose the same. James W. Pondelicek, Bessie F. Pondelicek et al. were made parties defendant. During the pendency of the litigation James W. Pondelieek died and the administratrix of his estate, Bessie F. Pondelieek, was made an additional party defendant, but the bill was thereafter dismissed as to the administratrix. Subsequently certain additional parties, not necessary to name, were…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sprague v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Foster Lumber Co. v. Harlan County BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Floyd v. HammondTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  4. Mayo v. MayoIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Cole v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Baker v. BakerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API