Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Goldman

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 31, 1949PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff, Herman Goldman, executor under the will of Louise G. Aldrich, deceased, seeks advice and instruction of the Court relating to the payment of taxes under the New Jersey Transfer Inheritance Tax Act, and the Federal Estate Tax Act.

The facts are stipulated and such as are pertinent, may be briefly summarized as follows:

The decedent entered into an inter vivos agreement of trust dated June 3, 1942, the entire principal of which was included in the gross taxable estate of the decedent for Federal Estate tax purposes and also for New Jersey Transfer Inheritance tax purposes. The will…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Edwards v. SlocumSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Turner v. ColeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. Gaede v. CarrollSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  4. Bemis v. ConverseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  5. Morristown Trust Co. v. ChildsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. National State Bank of Newark v. NadeauNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  2. Brauburger v. SheridanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  3. The Nat. State Bank of Newark v. MorrisonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  4. Gould v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 1981
  5. Kapnek v. KapnekNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API