Legal Opinion
National State Bank of Newark v. Nadeau
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 23, 1959PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
57 N.J. Super. 53 (1959)
153 A.2d 854
THE NATIONAL STATE BANK OF NEWARK, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS,
v.
LUCILLE NADEAU, NOW KNOWN AS LUCILLE BENNETT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 13, 1959.
Decided July 23, 1959.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and FREUND.
Mr. Harry Dvorken argued the cause for defendants-appellants and cross-respondents, residuary legatees Evelyn Fluet et al.
Mr. Willaim Howe Davis argued the cause for defendant and cross-respondent Lucille Nadeau (Bennett) (Messrs. Howe &…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Riggs v. Del DragoSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Turner v. ColeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Gaede v. CarrollSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Blauvelt v. the Citizens Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Case v. RoeblingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Perkins v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
- Estate of Haskell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
- Dodd v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1963
- In Re Armour's WillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- In Re Estate of GreenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.