Legal Opinion
Borah v. O'Niell
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided February 26, 1906No. 15,949PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Action by Charles F. Borah and John A. Landen against Charles O’Niell. An exception of no cause of action was overruled by the district court, and judgment was sustained by the Court of Appeal, and the suit dismissed, and plaintiff brings certiorari.
1Opinion of the CourtProvosty, J.
In the district court this ease was tried on the merits. In the Court of Appeal an exception of no cause of action, which had been overruled by the district court, was sustained, and the suit was dismissed. The case is before this court on writ of review to the Court of Appeal.
The petition reads as follows:
“That they are the owners in indivisión with Charles A. O’Niell of a certain sugar plantation situated in the parish of St. Mary, known as the Daisy or St. Mary Plantation; that after acquiring said plantation they entered into a verbal agreement of partnership by which they formed a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Succession of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
- Claiborne & Mather v. Their CreditorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
- Bradford's Heirs v. ClarkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1834
- Independent Ice & Distilled Water Manufacturing Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
- Smith v. CorcoranSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1834
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnston v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Borah & Landen v. O'NiellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
- Hart v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
- Buckley v. GeratySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919