Legal Opinion
Black Grievance Committee v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 13, 1984No. 84-3138PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JAMES HUNTER, III, Circuit Judge:
This case arises on a petition for review of a final order of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “the Board”) dismissing an unfair labor practice complaint against Intervenor, Philadelphia Electric Company (“PECO”). Petitioner, Black Grievance Committee (“BGC”), is an aggrieved person within the meaning of section 10(f) of the National Labor Relations Act (“the Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 160(f) (1982), and jurisdiction is based on that section. Because we conclude that the Board’s decision is contrary to the language and purposes of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Republic Aviation Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Radio Officers' Union of the Commercial Telegraphers Union v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- National Labor Relations Board v. Washington Aluminum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Black Grievance Committee v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984