Legal Opinion
Alford v. Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided February 12, 2025No. 3:23-cv-00138Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JAMES B. ALFORD, ET AL VERSUS CIVIL ACTION NO. 23-138-JWD-RLB TAYLOR-SEIDENBACH, INC., ET AL RULING AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 128) filed by defendant Union Carbide Corporation (“UCC”). Plaintiffs James B. Alford and Lillian A. Martin, individually and on behalf of James M. Alford (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), oppose the motion (Doc. 138). UCC did not file a reply. Oral argument is not necessary. The Court has carefully considered the law, the facts in the record, and the…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- International Shortstop, Inc., and Sam Talkington v. Rally's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Boudreaux v. Swift Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.