Legal Opinion

Schulte v. Baber Well Servicing Co.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 1982No. 5366PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge.

We granted an application for interlocutory appeal from the district court’s order allowing plaintiffs, Western Insurance Company and Ronald J. Schulte, to file a first amended complaint naming defendant’s insurance company. After Schulte was injured, Western paid him workmen’s compensation benefits. Both plaintiffs then filed a complaint for damages against an alleged third party tort-feasor, the defendant. Western is seeking reimbursement for the workmen’s compensation paid to plaintiff Schulte. After discovery, but before trial, plaintiffs learned defendant was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Springer Corporation v. HerreraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Sellman v. HaddockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Herrera v. Springer CorporationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Varney v. TaylorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Maurer v. ThorpeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Strickland v. Roosevelt County Rural Electric CooperativeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API