Legal Opinion
Amos v. Allstate Insurance Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided May 23, 2008No. S-12396, S-12415, S-12465PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
I. FACTS
The main question presented in this appeal is whether a river boat driven by Jack Tatum was insured when it collided with a river boat driven by John Tice. The accident occurred on August 9, 2000, in a narrow bend of the Little Susitaa River. Tatum was alone in his boat; Casey Amos was a passenger in Tice's boat. All three men were injured in the collision.
Jack Tatum co-owned his boat with his brother Joe. The boat had been insured under a boat owner's policy issued by Allstate Insurance Company to Joe Tatum and his wife Bertha in 1999. The policy was…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Jamison v. Consolidated Utilities, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Kollodge v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Joliffe v. Madison Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Seavey Ex Rel. Ellis v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Van Hulle v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Antonopoulos v. Mid-Century Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2021