Lindora, LLC v. Isagenix International, LLC
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Hon. Cynthia Bashant, United States District Judge
This action arises from Defendant Isage-nix International, LLC’s (“Isagenix”) and Defendant Ella Novokolsky’s (“Novokol-sky”) alleged use of Plaintiff Lindora, LLC’s (“Lindora”) “Lean for Life” marks. Before the Court is Isagenix’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue or, alternatively, to sever the claims against Isagenix and transfer those claims to the District of *1133Arizona. (ECF No. 13.) Lindora opposes. (ECF No. 18.)
The Court finds the motion suitable for disposition on the papers submitted…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- San Diego Cnty. Credit Union v. Citizens Equity First Credit UnionDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
- (PS)Singh v. Palmetto Consulting of Columbia, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Dinan & Company LLC v. Deaconess Associations IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- Dinan & Company LLC v. Deaconess Associations IncorporatedDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- HotSpot Therapeutics, Inc. v. Nurix Therapeutics, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.