Legal Opinion

Stupak-Thrall v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 23, 1996No. 94-1863Published

1Opinion of the Court

89 F.3d 1269

27 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,001

Kathy STUPAK-THRALL, Michael A. Gajewski, and Bodil

Gajewski, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES of America and Daniel R. Glickman, Secretary

of Agriculture, individually and in his official

capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-1863.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

July 23, 1996.

Todd S. Welch (argued and briefed), William P. Pendley, Mountain States Legal Foundation, Denver, CO, for Kathy Stupak-Thrall.

Todd S. Welch, Mountain States Legal Foundation, Denver, CO, Mark D. Tousignant, Iron River, MI, for Michael A. Gajewski, Bodil Gajewski.

Peter…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited84 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API