Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Ficken

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1932No. 5850PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant, driving his own automobile, was going duck hunting with respondent as his gratuitous guest. Descending an inclined road leading to certain river bottoms, the desired hunting ground, the car suddenly skidded, turned across and from the track of the road, and went over a steep embankment on one side of the road, rolling and turning over and injuring both parties.

Respondent sued appellant for general negligence in the driving of the car, and recovered a judgment for damages from which this appeal was taken.

The second assignment of error is that this portion of the direct examination…

2Cases cited97 opinions

  1. Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Tompkins v. Clay St. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Simpson v. . Foundation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Springs v. . DollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Klein v. BeetenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kozlowski v. RushIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Lallatin Ex Rel. Lallatin v. TerryIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Weller, Exrx. v. WorstallOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Barry v. Arrow Transportation CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Brown v. Jerry's Welding & Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API