Legal Opinion

People v. Dillard

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1984No. 83CA0442PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STERNBERG, Judge.

Defendant appeals a judgment of the trial court denying his Crim.P. 35(c) motion. He contends that his trial attorneys failed to render effective assistance. We affirm.

Defendant was charged with first degree assault. Although somewhat conflicting, the evidence at trial demonstrated that defendant had been drinking on September 27, 1978. That evening he was in a bar when, for no apparent reason, he slit the victim’s throat. Bar patrons testified that defendant then said, “Well, what’s wrong with that boy,” and, “If the police come nobody knows who did it.” Defendant testified…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hendershott v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  3. Stafford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. People v. WhiteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  5. People v. VelasquezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. NormanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. Stogner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. WashingtonColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Hamburg v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. GandiagaColorado Court of Appeals · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API