Legal Opinion

Beck v. Brower

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 11, 1960No. 38157PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Townsend, Judge.

1. It is the settled law of this State that Code § 114-105 barring an employee from the benefits of the workmen’s compensation law where the injuries result from his wilful misconduct, or wilful failure or refusal to perform a duty required by statute, places the burden on the employer to show that the breach was wilful, and that it takes something more than mere negligence, or even gross negligence, to carry this burden, although the proof that the conduct was wilful and wanton is carried by a preponderance of evidence so indicating.

2. The controlling case on this question as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ætna Life Insurance v. CarrollSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  2. Hall v. KendallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  3. The BORDEN COMPANY v. DollarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  4. Reid v. RaperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cornell-Young (Macon &C. Co.) v. MinterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. BrowerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Argonaut Insurance Co. v. AlmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  4. Steed v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. Argonaut Insurance Co. v. AlmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API