Legal Opinion

Luce v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 30, 1925Published

1DissentDavis, J.

The differences between the views of the majority of the court and our own in this case are narrowly limited. We may admit that but a single cause of action arises when death results from negligence, although there may be different grounds of liability, and several distinct remedies may be afforded under the common law and by statutes. Such statutes not only impose duties but create remedies. (Ward v. Erie R. R. Co., 230 N. Y. 230.) Agreeing that there was but a “ single wrong,” we differ in the effect to be given a judgment determining that a certain statute did not furnish any remedy under…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Troxell v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Snow v. AlleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  4. Stowell v. . ChamberlainNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Payne v. . N.Y., S. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API