Legal Opinion

Bourque v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided July 31, 1980No. Docket Nos. 4507-76, 7125-77, 1554-78, 1555-78UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MARCEL and BEVERLY BOURQUE, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent; CUMAR CO., INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Bourque v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 4507-76, 7125-77, 1554-78, 1555-78.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1980-286; 1980 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 300; 40 T.C.M. (CCH) 824; T.C.M. (RIA) 80286;

July 31, 1980, Filed

Moses Kando, for the petitioners.

Daniel P. Ehrenreich and Pamela V. Gibson, for the respondent.

RAUM

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

RAUM, Judge: The Commissioner determined deficiencies and additions to tax in respect of…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  3. Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Stone v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
  5. Otsuki v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hestnes v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API