Legal Opinion

Commercial Bank v. Maguire

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 1903No. Nos. 13,475—(126)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Lac qui Parle county, Powers, J., denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

Plaintiff seeks to recover upon a negotiable promissory note for $100, which it claims to have purchased before maturity, in the usual course of business. The defenses were: First, no considera-’ tion, with knowledge of its worthlessness; second, that there had been material alterations of the instrument before the transfer. The cause was tried to a jury, with verdict for defendant. This appeal is from an order denying a new trial.

The evidence is clear and ample that there was no consideration for the note, but it is claimed that there was a failure to show that plaintiff was not a bona fide…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Minnesota Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
  2. Hall v. HaleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1831
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. GreenleafSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. Stein v. RheinstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Waltham State Bank v. TuttleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API