Legal Opinion

Chiasera v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1979PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Rudolph U. Johnson, J.

Plaintiffs, August and Helen Chiasera, seek an order of this court pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [b]) dismissing an affirmative defense as interposed in the answer of the defendant Ignatius S. Bertola, M.D.

The underlying facts are not disputed. Plaintiff, August *878Chiasera, injured his back while working at Spaulding Fibre Co., Inc. in Tonawanda, New York, on March 1, 1975. Plaintiff was directed by defendant Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin, the workers’ compensation carrier for Spaulding, to be examined by defendant Bertola.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rogers v. HorvathMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Hale v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Johnston v. SibleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Armstrong v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Greenberg v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. Mero v. SadoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. McKinney v. Bellevue HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Davis v. TirrellNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Polidoro v. Chubb Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API