Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Holder
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided April 10, 1986PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANCE, Justice.
The question on appeal is the validity of a conviction of three defendants accused of the same offense and represented at trial by the same counsel when the trial judge failed to comply with RCr 8.30.
RCr 8.30(1) provides:
“(1) If the crime of which the defendant is charged is punishable by a fine of more than $500, or by confinement, no attorney shall be permitted at any stage of the proceedings to act as counsel for him while at the same time engaged as counsel for another person or persons *908accused of the same offense or of offenses arising out of the same incident or series of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Smith v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
- Trulock v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1981
3Cited by14 opinions
- Talbott v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
- Brewer v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
- Kirkland v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
- Peyton v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1996
- Conn v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.