Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Holder

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1986PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANCE, Justice.

The question on appeal is the validity of a conviction of three defendants accused of the same offense and represented at trial by the same counsel when the trial judge failed to comply with RCr 8.30.

RCr 8.30(1) provides:

“(1) If the crime of which the defendant is charged is punishable by a fine of more than $500, or by confinement, no attorney shall be permitted at any stage of the proceedings to act as counsel for him while at the same time engaged as counsel for another person or persons *908accused of the same offense or of offenses arising out of the same incident or series of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Trulock v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1981

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Talbott v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Brewer v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Kirkland v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Peyton v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Conn v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API