Legal Opinion

Sliski v. Krol

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 3, 1972PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTauro, C.J.

This is an action of contract by the administratrix of the estate of Alphonse Krol against the administratrix of the estate of John Krol. The plaintiff contends that the intestates, John Krol and Alphonse Krol (father and son) entered into an oral agreement whereby certain services rendered by Alphonse for his father would be compensated for by a provision in the will of the father. The father failed to make such a provision in his will and the plaintiff seeks recovery for the fair value of the services rendered by her intestate.

The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The case is here…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Price, Administrator v. HolmesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. Bickford v. FurberMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. Bremer v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  4. Martinelli v. BurkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Stearns v. BlevinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McStowe v. BornsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Barber v. FoxMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  3. Pobieglo v. Monsanto Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  4. Mueller v. Mueller and Joseph F. Mueller TrustSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  5. Rendek v. Sheriff of Bristol CountyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API