Legal Opinion

Bickford v. Furber

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 26, 1930PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, J.

This is an action of tort to recover for the death of Donald E. Bickford, the plaintiff’s intestate, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of Arthur Mertin, the defendant’s intestate. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. The case is here on the defendant’s bill of exceptions, which raises the question whether the action was brought seasonably. If it was not, judgment, by agreement of the parties, is to be entered for the defendant.

Donald E. Bickford died March 16, 1927, from injuries received in a collision between a motor truck on which he was riding and an automobile owned and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Duggan v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  2. Reading Co. v. KoonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Putnam v. SavageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Sterling v. Frederick Leyland & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  5. Bremer v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Gaudette v. WebbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  2. Frazee v. PartneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  3. Baker v. BaningosoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  4. Ford v. RogovinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Gordon v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API