Anderson v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge.
Case Summary
John M. Anderson appeals his 1999 conviction following a bench trial for molesting a three-year-old child. Specifically, he contends that he did not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive his right to a trial by jury. Because the record does not reflect that Anderson affirmatively acted to waive his right to a trial by jury, the waiver is invalid. We therefore vacate Anderson's conviction and remand this case for a new trial. However, we also address the victim's out-of-court statements under Crawford v. Washington and Indiana's Protected Persons…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Hammon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Pierce v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Poore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- O'CONNOR v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Adam Horton v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
- Hernandez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Blount v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Blount v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.