Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 26, 2005No. 60A05-0411-CR-586PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

John M. Anderson appeals his 1999 conviction following a bench trial for molesting a three-year-old child. Specifically, he contends that he did not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive his right to a trial by jury. Because the record does not reflect that Anderson affirmatively acted to waive his right to a trial by jury, the waiver is invalid. We therefore vacate Anderson's conviction and remand this case for a new trial. However, we also address the victim's out-of-court statements under Crawford v. Washington and Indiana's Protected Persons…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Hammon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Pierce v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Poore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. O'CONNOR v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Adam Horton v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Hernandez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. Taylor v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Blount v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  5. Blount v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API