Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Alison
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 19, 1998No. Misc. No. AG 65, Sept. Term, 1996PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASANOW, Judge.
We are once again called upon to discipline Stuart L. Alison 1 (Respondent) who was admitted to the Maryland bar in 1978. At the direction of the Review Board, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (Petitioner) through Bar Counsel filed a petition for disciplinary action against Respondent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-709. In the petition, it is alleged that Respondent has engaged in misconduct, as defined by Maryland Rule 16-701k, 2 with regard to three unrelated cases. We ordered that this matter be transmitted to Judge Alfred L. Brennan, Sr., of the Circuit Court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Gary HalbertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Bar Ass'n v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Parren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. TKU AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MonfriedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. FezellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Parler & Wobber v. Miles & Stockbridge, P.C.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.