Legal Opinion

Lydon v. Lydon

New York Family Court

Decided September 30, 1981PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Edward J. McLaughlin, J.

Envisioned as an experimental court* the Family Court has evolved as a court which must eschew the experimental approach and adhere to its statutorily enunciated powers. (Matter of Lorie C., 49 NY2d 161; Walker v Buscaglia, 71 AD2d 315.) When there is no statutory procedure prescribed by the Family Court Act, the CPLR applies. (Family Ct Act, § 164.) Where, as here, the petitioner has bound herself in a legally binding contract, this court is precluded from granting relief. The Family Court has no powers of equity.

A petition to modify an order made…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boden v. BodenNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. In re Lorie C.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Walker v. BuscagliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. Gauthier v. GabelNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Gauthier v. GabelNew York Court of Appeals · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ettore I. v. Angela D.New York City Family Court · 1985
  2. In re JenniferNew York City Family Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API