Legal Opinion
Gauthier v. Gabel
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 3, 1964PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMargaret Mart J. Mangan, J.
The plaintiffs, husband and wife, are tenants of the luxury apartment building at 30 Beekman Place, whose apartment was decontrolled on October 1, 1964, pursuant to Local Law No. 13 of the City of New York for the year 1964. Defendant is the City Rent Administrator. Heretofore, on October 26, 1964, this court denied the plaintiffs ’ motion for an injunction pendente lite to restrain the defendant from enforcing Local Law No. 13 and granted permission to Transnation Realty Corp., the owner of premises 30 Beekman Place, to intervene. Both the defendant Rent Administrator and the landlord…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Woods v. Cloyd W. Miller Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- East New York Savings Bank v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Wasservogel v. MeyerowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pledge v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Himmel v. Chase Manhattan BankCivil Court of the City of New York · 1965
- Parrino v. LindsayNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Pledge v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Gangemi v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.