Jocie Motor Lines, Inc. v. Johnson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.
We think the questions sought to be litigated in tbis action were or might bave been adjudicated in the case of Hodges, et als. v. Johnson, et als., 52 F. Supp. 488. Tbe plaintiff herein was made a third party defendant in tbat action, under tbe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 14, 28 U.S.C.A., Sec. 723c, governing third party practice. Tbe rule permits a defendant “to bring in a third party, provided tbe third party is liable to tbe defendant by way of contribution, indemnity, or otherwise, for the claim made against him.” 35 C.J.S., p. 993, where tbe reason for tbis rule is also…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hancock National Bank v. FarnumSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Hodges v. JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1943
- Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Brown v. L. H. Bottoms Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- King v. GrindstaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Newsome v. SurrattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Mann v. VIRGINIA DARE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- McGill v. Bison Fast Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Weaver v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.