Legal Opinion

Dallas Power & Light Co. v. Cleghorn

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1981No. C-197PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAY, Justice.

This case involves interpretation of eleven no term coal and lignite leases. The issue is whether, under the express terms of the leases, there is an implied covenant to develop. Lessors, J. Y. Cleghom and others, sought a declaratory judgment cancel-ling the leases, or in the alternative a conditional decree requiring lessees to explore and develop the leased land under an implied covenant to develop. Lessees, Dallas Power & Light Company and others, filed motions for summary judgment alleging that the express terms of the leases precluded an implied covenant to develop. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Waggoner Estate v. Sigler Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Freeport Sulphur Co. v. American Sulphur Royalty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Cleghorn v. Dallas Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Ricane Enterprises, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Rogers v. Ricane Enterprises, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. TCA Building Co. v. Entech, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
  4. Frost National Bank v. L & F Distributors, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  5. Anbeck Co. v. Zapata Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API