Legal Opinion

Rockford Trust Company v. Purtell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 1, 1931PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The facts out of which this litigation arose, while somewhat complicated, are practically undisputed, and are to the following effect.

The Rockford Trust Company, as administrator of the estate of Mrs. Martha Smith, brought suit to foreclose a mortgage executed on March 13, 1924, by O. P. Purtell and wife to the Guthrie Mortgage Company. The mortgage was given to secure a loan of $1,'200, evidenced by a principal note for that amount, due December 1, 1933, with 10 per cent, interest coupons attached thereto. The mortgage was upon the usual conditions, and contained an accelerating clause,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jackson ex dem. Norton v. WillardNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  2. Smith v. ButlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  3. Pullen v. WardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
  4. Troyer v. CameronSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  5. Beard v. Bank of OsceolaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Veal v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (In Re Veal)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Ragge v. BryanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  3. 5-Star Management, Inc. v. RogersDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  4. Bryan v. Easton Tire Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  5. Sunvara Land Co. v. Fiduciary Trust Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API