Legal Opinion

Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Lassiter

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1910PublishedCited by 9 opinions

This case was decided by the court En Banc. Writ of error to the Circuit Court for St. Lucie County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, C. J.

The defendant in error recovered judgment for damages against the railroad company for personal injuries received by the running of a train while acting as yard switchman. A former judgment was *249reversed. Florida East Coast Ry. v. Lassiter, 58 Fla., 234, 50 South. Rep. 428. A grab-iron on a freight car broke while the plaintiff was holding on by it and he fell under the car which passed over his left foot crushing it.

The negligence alleged to have proximately caused the injury is that the railroad company “carelessly and negligently permitted one of the grab-irons and its fastenings and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. CrosbySupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. BeazleySupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  3. German American Lumber Co. v. BrockSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  4. Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  5. Kilpatrick v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1902

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Holstun & Son v. EmbrySupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. WhitneySupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  3. Insurance Co. of North Am. v. PasakarnisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. German-American Lumber Co. v. HannahSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  5. Koran v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API