Rhonda Marie Sinclair v. Kevin Dean Sinclair
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAUTZ, Justice.
[T1] Rhonda Marie Sinclair (Wife) appeals from a divorce decree, claiming the district court erred when it declined to require Kevin Dean Sinclair (Husband) to pay interest on the amount it ordered him to pay to equalize the division of marital property. We conclude the district court properly exercised its discretion when it suspended payment of interest as long as Husband makes annual payments of at least $15,000 toward the property allocation. We, therefore, affirm. |
ISSUE
[¶2] Wife presents the_ issue for our determination as follows:
Whether the district court erred when it…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Paul v. PaulWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Reavis v. ReavisWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Salmeri v. SalmeriWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- Warren v. WarrenWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
- Metz v. MetzWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Joyce Halling and Medcon Inc., a Utah corporation v. David A. Yovanovich and Ornella Dalla BonaWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Andrew P. Johnson v. Katie L. JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Kelli Sue Williams v. Charles Leslie WilliamsWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Todd McInerney v. Veronica KramerWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
- Adrienne Janel Edwards v. Andy EdwardsWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.