Legal Opinion
Mixon v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 29, 2012No. A130413; No. A131474PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*129Opinion
SEPULVEDA, J.*
A motorist struck and injured a boy walking with his family in a marked crosswalk. The injured boy and his siblings sued the motorist and others for personal injury and emotional distress. This appeal concerns claims against California’s Department of Transportation (State) and Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E).
Plaintiffs sued the State upon allegations that it maintained the street intersection in a dangerous condition (Gov. Code, § 835), and faulted the lighting configuration, lack of traffic control signals and signs, placement of signs, the type of crosswalk…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hilts v. County of SolanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Salas v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- White v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Antenor v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Brenner v. City of El CajonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pedeferri v. Seidner EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Ex parte City of Birmingham PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS: CIVIL (In re: Nicholas Raynard Smith, Jr. v. City of Birmingham) (Jefferson Circuit Court: CV-21-901781).Supreme Court of Alabama · 2025
- Liss v. City of San Diego CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Nubani v. County of Los Angeles CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Pagan v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.