State v. McDaniel
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
McCORMICK, Justice.
Defendant appeals his convictions and sentences on three counts of delivery of a controlled substance in violation of § 204.-401(1), The Code. The substances were marijuana, pentobarbital and phenobarbital. His trial was bifurcated under procedures delineated in State v. Monroe, 236 N.W.2d 24 (Iowa 1975). He contends that the trial court, Werling, J., erred in several respects in the first proceeding and that the accommodation trial court, Grant J., erred in the second. We find merit only in his contention that the accommodation trial court erred in overruling his motion…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. MonroeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- State v. PriceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- State v. LyonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. O'CONNELLSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- State v. DuncanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- State v. CottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- State v. Allan Banks Gibb IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.