Legal Opinion

Bettman-Dunlap Co. v. Gertz

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1928No. 26991PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

This is an appeal, to settle the principles of the case, from a decree overruling a demurrer to an original bill and overruling a motion to dissolve a preliminary injunction issued pursuant to- the prayer of the bill. „ It appears, in substance, from the bill that in 1920 Gertz Bros., a partnership, composed of the appellee, Ben Gertz, and Abe and Frank Gertz, engaged in the mercantile business at Lexington and Cruger, Miss., purchased from Helmers-Bettman & Co., now BettmanDunlap 'Company, of Cincinnati, Ohio, a lot of shoes to be delivered at a-future date, the price to be paid therefor to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hall v. WaddillMississippi Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Feld & Silverberg v. ColemanMississippi Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Sterling Products Co. v. Watkins-Gray Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1922
  4. A. A. Posey & Bro. v. MaddoxMississippi Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Bettman-Dunlap Co. v. Gertz Bros.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chandler v. CookeMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Forrest County Cooperative Ass'n v. McCaffreyMississippi Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Little Horn State Bank v. GrossMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. United States v. Raley Contracting CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1962
  5. Hedges v. Louisiana Agricultural Supply Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API